Magnetic Therapy: Ancient Practice, Modern Research
Magnetic therapy has moved from historical curiosity to modern investigation. Below is a plain-language summary of reported clinical studies and trial outcomes related to static magnets and pain relief. Study designs, magnet strengths, and body sites vary, and results should be interpreted with care.
Static Magnets over Pain Trigger Points
A double-blind trial compared an active static magnet (approx. 300–500 gauss at the surface) to a visually identical placebo device applied over painful trigger points in post-polio participants.
| Measure | Active Magnet | Placebo Device |
|---|---|---|
| Participants | 29 | 21 |
| Pretreatment pain (0–10) | 9.6 | 9.5 |
| Post-treatment pain (0–10) | 4.4 | 8.4 |
| Mean change | −5.2 | −1.1 |
Active: 22/29 (76%)
Placebo: 4/21 (19%)
Reported conclusion: applying a static magnetic field of ~300–500 gauss over a trigger point was associated with prompt pain reductions in the active group compared with placebo in post-polio subjects.
Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy (Foot Discomfort)
In reports summarized for pain management journals, socks incorporating magnets were associated with reductions in chronic foot discomfort related to peripheral neuropathy. Product designs and magnet specifications varied by study.
Back and Shoulder Pain (Double-Blind Trial)
In a randomized, double-blind trial (n=100), participants with back or shoulder pain received either active magnets or demagnetized look-alikes. Outcomes favored the active-magnet group:
| Outcome | Active Magnet | Placebo |
|---|---|---|
| Less subjective pain | 70% | 26% |
| Less restriction of movement | 50% | 16% |
| Reduced use of pain killers | 46% | 10% |
Reported conclusion: magnetized foils outperformed placebo foils for pain, mobility restriction, and analgesic use within the trial conditions.
Heel Pain (Podiatric Clinic, Double-Blind)
A double-blind evaluation of permanently magnetized vs. demagnetized pads for heel pain syndrome reported higher response rates in magnetized pads, including:
- 57.2% reporting meaningful reduction in heel-spur–related pain.
- 77.1% improved ability to walk without pain vs. 16.6% with demagnetized pads.
Other Reported Applications
Across summaries and reviews, static magnets have been reported for various superficial aches and overuse symptoms (e.g., strains, sprains, spasms). Individual studies differ in quality, magnet specification, and endpoints.
Where EvraCare™ Fits
The EvraCare™ Back Support Brace integrates strategically placed static magnets with tourmaline-fiber materials and ergonomic compression. It’s a wearable, drug-free option people use to support comfort during daily activity. Results vary by individual.
Not medical advice. EvraCare™ products are not medical devices and are not intended to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any disease. Individuals with pacemakers or implanted electronics should consult a clinician before use.